In its number 24, from May-June 1976, he published the resolutions of the congress, the words of Carlos Andrés Pérez, those of Thompson Dudley, and took advantage of Felipe González's stay in Caracas to do a long interview with him.29. The texts are suitable for a doctoral thesis, which is beyond the scope of this work.30. Now, very significantly, Nueva Sociedad did not take up Betancourt's or Haya de la Torre's words. A sign of the moment. She seemed more interested in what in effect was the future of Social Democracy than in what the glorious past could still comment on.
Neither of the two all-timers would survive the Conference for long. There is an important fact that, in this sense, it is necessary to highlight: very significantly, the Caracas south africa phone number list Conference had the long –and perhaps a bit ostentatious– title of Meeting of political leaders of Europe and America in favor of international democratic solidarity. It was not remotely a free name. For all those Latin American parties that "for decades have fought for freedom, democracy and social progress", as Brandt said, he immediately referred to the two Pro Democracy and Liberty congresses (Havana, 1950; Maracay, 1960), organized , as has been said, by the so-called Caribbean democratic left , so reluctant to form part of any international.
After the dissolution of Aprismo as a continental movement, all these parties emphasized their difference with the communists, emphasizing that they responded to the specifications of their countries (not even of Indo-America) ., an Aprista category that was never very popular in the Caribbean due to its obvious exclusion of Afro-descendant populations), and that in no way were they going to pass from US imperialism, which resisted, but with which it was possible to negotiate in some way, to Soviet imperialism. Such had been the fundamental principles of Betancourt and AD.